MetaCartSign in to MyCiteSeer

Include Citations | Advanced Search | Help

Include Citations | Advanced Search | Help

  Teaching and assessing engineering design: a review of the research (1998) [6 citations — 0 self]

Download:
Download as a PDF
by Susan Campbell, Carol L. Colbeck
in ‘ASEE Annual Conference Proceedings’, American Society for Engineering Education check
http://www.asee.org/conferences/search/00551.PDF
Add To MetaCart

Abstract:

the United States currently focuses on the study of engineering science at the expense of design. In a brief history of engineering design education, Eder (1991) explains that in the 1950s the engineering curricula shifted from a focus on teaching students about technology used in industry to an emphasis on engineering science including math, physics, and chemistry. He contends that faculty began to become more research-oriented and institutions of higher education placed less value on industry experience among faculty at roughly the same time. Eder argues that these factors contributed to the recent lack of emphasis on design skills and abilities in engineering curricula. He attributes renewed attention to design in curricula to a 1985 National Science Foundation initiative that resulted in funding to improve undergraduate engineering design education. The Accreditation Board for Engineering Technology (ABET) and many industry representatives join the National Academy of Sciences in calling for a renewed emphasis on the development of design skills among undergraduate engineering students. ABET stipulates that graduates of accredited engineering programs demonstrate skills and competencies such as an “ability to design a system, component, or process; an ability to function on multidisciplinary teams; an ability to identify, formulate, and solve engineering problems;...[and] an ability to communicate effectively ” (ASEE Prism, 1997, p. 41). Likewise, industry representatives emphasize that undergraduate engineering students should develop an understanding of the design process as well as the ability to work in teams, communicate effectively, think critically, and solve problems (Rhoads, et al., 1995; Coleman, 1996). This paper begins with a definition of engineering design followed by a summary of the research on teaching design and assessing student design competence and concludes with implications for future research to improve engineering education.

Citations

9 A freshman engineering design course – Dally, Zhang - 1993
5 Teaching Invention and Design: Multi-Disciplinary Learning Modules – Gorman, Richards, et al. - 1995
4 Teaming in the design laboratory – Byrd - 1995
4 On Effective Methods to teach Mechanical Design – Harris, Jacobs - 1995
3 A PractitionerEducator Partnership for Teaching Engineering Design – Knox, A, et al. - 1995
2 The engineering education coalitions: A progress report – Coleman - 1996
2 A model curriculum for a capstone course in multidisciplinary engineering design – Miller - 1994
2 Outcomes Assessment in Engineering Education – Shaeiwitz - 1996
1 Teaching design to freshman: Style and content – Dym - 1994
1 Engineering design education: Situation report – Eder - 1991
1 Final evaluation report: Engineering coalition of schools for excellence in education and leadership technology reinvestment project – Rhoads, Paulson, et al. - 1995
1 Critical thinking and design: Evolution of a freshman engineering graphics course – Sanchez, Hight - 1995