See this document in CiteSeerX!

Techniques for Automated Drafting of Judicial Documents (1998)  (Make Corrections)  (2 citations)
L. Karl Branting



  Home/Search   Context   Related

 
View or download:
uwyo.edu/~karl/papers/jilt.ps
uwyo.edu/~karl/papers/jilt.ps
Cached:  PS.gz  PS  PDF   Image  Update  Help

From:  uwyo.edu/~karl/pubs (more)
(Enter author homepages)

Rate this article: (best)
  Comment on this article  
(Enter summary)

Abstract: Document drafting is an essential component of judicial problem solving. This paper distinguishes several classes of judicial documents based on (1) the stage of the judicial process in which they are created, (2) the complexity of the documents, and (3) the party who drafts the documents: a judge, judicial support personnel, or a litigant. Three approaches to automated document drafting are identified and the applicability of these approaches to each class of judicial document is described.... (Update)

Context of citations to this paper:   More

...and memoranda. Moreover, judicial decision making entails creation of a wide range of documents, from brief orders to lengthy decisions [Bra98]. In general, the focus of legal knowledge based system development has been on legal reasoning at the expense of knowledge concerning...

.... the drafter s legal goals and the stylistic constraints applicable to the document genre (Lauritsen, 1993; Gordon, 1989; Branting et al. 1998). The most appropriate approach to automated document drafting depends on the complexity and variability of the documents and the...

Cited by:   More
An Advisory System for Pro Se Protection Order Applicants - Branting   (Correct)
Integrating Discourse and Domain Knowledge for Document .. - Branting, Callaway.. (1999)   (Correct)

Active bibliography (related documents):   More   All
1.5:   Automating Judicial Document Drafting: A Discourse-Based.. - Branting, Lester, Callaway (1997)   (Correct)
1.1:   Automated Drafting of Self-Explaining Documents - Branting, Lester, Callaway (1997)   (Correct)
1.0:   Justification Structures for Document Reuse - Branting, Lester (1996)   (Correct)

Similar documents based on text:   More   All
0.9:   An Issue-Oriented Approach to Judicial Document Assembly - Branting   (Correct)
0.9:   GEE Models of Judicial Behavior - Zorn (1998)   (Correct)
0.8:   A Framework for Self-Explaining Legal Documents - Branting, Lester (1996)   (Correct)

Related documents from co-citation:   More   All
2:   Rule-Based Expert Systems (context) - Buchanan, Shortliffe - 1984
2:   A theory construction approach to legal document assembly (context) - Gordon - 1989
2:   Knowing documents (context) - Lauritsen - 1993

BibTeX entry:   (Update)

L. Karl Branting. Techniques for automated drafting of judicial documents. International Journal of Law and Information Technology, 6(2):214--229, 1998. http://citeseer.ist.psu.edu/branting98techniques.html   More

@misc{ branting98techniques,
  author = "L. Branting",
  title = "Techniques for automated drafting of judicial documents",
  text = "L. Karl Branting. Techniques for automated drafting of judicial documents.
    International Journal of Law and Information Technology, 6(2):214--229,
    1998.",
  year = "1998",
  url = "citeseer.ist.psu.edu/branting98techniques.html" }
Citations (may not include all citations):
519   and the Structure of Discourse (context) - Grosz, Sidner et al. - 1986
224   Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language (context) - Searle - 1969
75   Coherence and Co-reference (context) - Hobbs - 1979
25   the Need for Domain Communication Knowledge (context) - Kittredge, Korelsky et al. - 1991
18   Health Doc: Customizing Patient Information and Health Educa.. - DiMarco, Hirst et al. - 1995
11   Personal communication (context) - Charles, Rippey - 1991
9   Knowledge requirements for the automatic generation of proje.. (context) - Korelsky, McCullough et al. - 1993
8   Cambridge University Press: Cambridge (context) - Toulmin, of - 1958
8   Technology report: Building legal practice systems with toda.. (context) - Lauritsen - 1992
7   A Constraint-Driven System for Contract Assembly - Daskalopulu, Sergot - 1995  ACM   DBLP
7   The Split-Up System: Integrating Neural Networks and Rule-Ba.. (context) - Zeleznikow, Stranieri - 1995  DBLP
6   An Issue-Oriented Approach to Judicial Document Assembly - Branting - 1993  ACM   DBLP
6   PLAID - Proactive Legal Assistance (context) - Bench-Capon, Staniford - 1995
5   Scaling Up Explanation Generation: Large-Scale Knowledge-Bas.. - Lester, Porter - 1996
5   Justification Structures for Document Reuse - Branting, Lester - 1996  ACM   DBLP
4   A Specialized Expert System for Judicial Decision Support (context) - Pethe, Rippey et al. - 1989  ACM   DBLP
3   New Approaches to Reducing Court Delay and Congestion (context) - Snellenburg - 1989
1   The DHSS retirement pension forecast and advice system (context) - Spirgel-Sinclair - 1988  ACM
1   Automating Drafting of Self-Explaining Documents (context) - Branting, Lester et al. - 1997
1   Technical Report ISI/RS-87-190 (context) - Mann, Thompson et al. - 1987
1   Pre-Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Log.. (context) - Gordon, Construction et al. - 1989
1   Fourth International Conference on Artificial Intelligence a.. (context) - Lauritsen, documents - 1993
1   Syntax and Semantics 2: Speech Acts (context) - Grice, Conversation'In et al. - 1975

Documents on the same site (http://meru.uwyo.edu/~karl/pubs.html):   More
Automated Acquisition of User Preferences - Branting, Broos (1994)   (Correct)
A Computational Model of Ratio Decidendi - Branting (1994)   (Correct)
Automating Judicial Document Drafting: A Discourse-Based.. - Branting, Lester, Callaway (1997)   (Correct)

Online articles have much greater impact   More about CiteSeer.IST   Add search form to your site   Submit documents   Feedback  

CiteSeer.IST - Copyright Penn State and NEC