(Enter summary)
Abstract: Ada is unique amongst modern high-level languages in the degree
to which it allows programming errors to be trapped at the
compilation stage. Using a tool like the SPARK Examiner
amplifies this effect and can provide a high degree of confidence
that a program is well formed before we try and verify that its
behaviour is correct. Despite this progress a less tractable class of
errors remain: run-time exceptions. For safety-related systems a
run-time error may be just as hazardous as any... (Update)
Cited by: More
Automation for Exception Freedom Proofs - Bill Ellis And (2003)
(Correct)
A Practical Perspective on the Verifying Compiler Proposal - Ireland
(Correct)
An overview of JML tools and applications - Burdy, Cheon, Cok, Ernst.. (2004)
(Correct)
Active bibliography (related documents): More All
0.5: A Language for Systems not Just Software - Peter Amey Praxis (2001)
(Correct)
0.5: The HADES Architectural Style - Development and Definition - Stephenson, Buttle (2004)
(Correct)
0.5: An Overview of the Jahob Analysis System - Project Goals and.. - Kuncak, Rinard
(Correct)
Similar documents based on text: More All
0.8: Document Set SPARK 95 Reference SPARK 95/3.1 - Title Spark The
(Correct)
0.5: Closing the Loop: The Influence of Code Analysis on - Design Peter Amey
(Correct)
0.5: Industrial Experience with SPARK - Chapman (2000)
(Correct)
Related documents from co-citation: More All
5: Dynamically Discovering Likely Program Invariants to Support Program Evolution
- Ernst, Cockrell et al. - 1999
4: annotation assistant escjava (context) - Rustan, an et al. - 2001
4: A runtime assertion checker for the Java Modeling Language
- Cheon, Leavens - 2002
BibTeX entry: (Update)
Peter Amey and Roderick Chapman. Industrial strength exception freedom. In ACM SigAda 2002, pages 1--9. ACM, 2002. http://citeseer.ist.psu.edu/amey02industrial.html More
@misc{ amey02industrial,
author = "P. Amey and R. Chapman",
title = "Industrial strength exception freedom",
text = "Peter Amey and Roderick Chapman. Industrial strength exception freedom.
In ACM SigAda 2002, pages 1--9. ACM, 2002.",
year = "2002",
url = "citeseer.ist.psu.edu/amey02industrial.html" }
Citations (may not include all citations):
125
Extreme Programming Explained (context) - Beck
64
The Infeasibility of Quantifying the Reliability of Life-Cri..
- Ricky, Finelli - 1993
37
High Integrity Ada: The SPARK Approach (context) - Barnes - 1997
20
Security Engineering (context) - Anderson - 2001
13
Combining Static Worst-Case Timing Analysis and Program Proo.. (context) - Chapman, Burns et al. - 1996
9
Limits to evaluation of software dependability (context) - Littlewood
6
Is Proof More Cost-Effective than Testing (context) - King, Hammond et al. - 2000
3
Automatic Proof of the Absence of Run-Time Errors (context) - Garnsworthy, O'Neill et al. - 1993
2
Using the SPARK toolset for Showing the Absence of Run-Time .. (context) - Foulger, King - 2001
1
Lorenzo: Validation of Ultrahigh Dependability for Software-.. (context) - Bev - 1993
1
ACM SIGPLAN Workshop on Program Analysis for Software Tools .. (context) - Whiting, Hill et al. - 1999
1
Exposing Uninitialized Variables: Strengthening and Extendin.. (context) - Dewar, Hainque et al. - 2002
http://pvs.csl.sri.com/
http://csrc.nist.gov/cc
http://www.polyspace.com/
Documents on the same site (http://www.sparkada.com/publications.html): More
Re-engineering a safety-critical application using SPARK 95.. - Chapman, Dewar (1999)
(Correct)
Breaking Through the V and V Bottleneck - Martin Croxford And (1995)
(Correct)
A Language for Systems not Just Software - Peter Amey Praxis (2001)
(Correct)
Online articles have much greater impact More about CiteSeer.IST Add search form to your site Submit documents Feedback
CiteSeer.IST - Copyright Penn State and NEC