(Enter summary)
Abstract: This paper argues that a semiotic-conceptual framework is suitable for knowledge
representation because it combines conceptual structures with semiotic aspects. The advantages of
such a framework are discussed and explained using an example from an ontology language. (Update)
Active bibliography (related documents): More All
0.5: Clumping Properties of Content-Bearing Words - Bookstein, Klein, Raita (1998)
(Correct)
0.3: Modelling Lexical Databases with Formal Concept Analysis - Priss, Old (2004)
(Correct)
0.2: Linguistic Applications of Formal Concept Analysis - Priss (2004)
(Correct)
Similar documents based on text:
0.0: Unknown -
(Correct)
BibTeX entry: (Update)
@misc{ priss-semioticconceptual,
author = "Uta Priss",
title = "A Semiotic-Conceptual Framework for Knowledge Representation",
url = "citeseer.ist.psu.edu/741086.html" }
Citations (may not include all citations):
388
Conceptual Structures: Information Processing in Mind and Ma.. (context) - Sowa - 1984
298
The Object-Oriented Database System Manifesto
- Atkinson, Bancilhon et al. - 1989
49
Formal Concept Analysis (context) - Bernhard, Rudolf - 1999
18
WordNet: An Electronic Lexical Database and Some of its Appl.. (context) - Fellbaum - 1998
5
Information Flow (context) - Jon, Jerry - 1997
3
What is a Sign (context) - Charles
2
Organizing information (context) - Dagobert - 1985
1
Faceted Knowledge Representation (context) - Uta - 2000
1
Signs and Formal Concepts
- Uta - 2004
Documents on the same site (http://www.upriss.org.uk/top/research.html): More
Signs and Formal Concepts - Priss (2004)
(Correct)
Efficient Implementation of Semantic Relations in Lexical Databases - Priss (1999)
(Correct)
Formalizing Botanical Taxonomies - Priss (2003)
(Correct)
Online articles have much greater impact More about CiteSeer.IST Add search form to your site Submit documents Feedback
CiteSeer.IST - Copyright Penn State and NEC