MetaCartSign in to MyCiteSeer

Include Citations | Advanced Search | Help

Include Citations | Advanced Search | Help

  Using Mission Graphs to Identify Mission Dependability Bottlenecks Abstract in Complex Systems

Download:
Download as a PDF
by Prof Phil Koopman, Christopher L. Martin, Christopher L. Martin
http://www.ece.cmu.edu/~koopman/thesis/martin.pdf
Add To MetaCart

Abstract:

Embedded systems of today pose difficult dependability challenges. Hardware and software requirements as well as human interface components all contribute to or detract from the overall dependability of a system. Assigning a ‘dependability number ’ to a system is becoming increasingly subjective due to the confluence of these three areas. In particular it is important to go beyond composing individual component reliability predictions, and additionally consider factors such as ease of user workaround in the face of a partial system failure. In this paper we shall present an approach that attempts to detect these dependability bottlenecks within embedded systems and investigate its ability to represent users ’ ability to interact with partially failed systems. We propose a graph-based approach that is partially based on composing and extending Unified Modeling Language (UML) standards. This ‘mission graph ’ concept is meant to take advantage of the user’s perspective to help system designers understand what is really going on in complex systems. We apply this approach to an example embedded system, and examine the experimental results to determine the feasibility of the proposed approach. Finally, the mission graph approach is used to further investigate the workaround concept and how it applies to users attempting to accomplish their goals even in the face of component failures. 2 1.

Citations

392 Intorudction to Graph Theory – West
121 Dependability: Basic concepts and terminology – Laprie - 1992
68 The integration of computing and routine work – Gasser - 1986
49 L.: DEPEND: A simulation-based environment for system level dependability analysis – Goswami, Iyer, et al. - 1997
10 Using GOMS for user interface design and evaluation – John, Kieras - 1996
8 Hierarchical Simulation Approach to Accurate Fault Modeling for System Dependability Evaluation – Kalbarczyk, Iyer, et al. - 1999
8 Eliminating exception handling errors with dependability cases: a comparative, empirical study – Maxion, Olszewski - 2000
7 et al. Formal Approach to Scenario Analysis – Hsia - 1994
3 The Measure of Man and Woman – Dreyfuss - 1993
3 Analyzing Dependability of Embedded Systems from the User – Latronico, Martin - 2001
3 Software Engineering Measures for Predicting Software Reliability – Smidts, Li - 2000
2 System Dependability Assessment Tool – Brehm - 1996
2 Technical Guidelines on Embedded Systems.” IEE Seminar on Year 2000: A Practical Approach to Medical Devices and Hospital Systems – Manning - 1999
2 Applications for Faster to Reliability and Readiness Analysis of Complex Reconfigurable Fault Tolerant Systems – Zemany - 1991
1 Representing Embedded System Sequence Diagrams as a Formal Language – Latronico, Koopman - 2001
1 Workshop an Dependable Embedded Systems – Raghavan