(Enter summary)
Abstract: Model checking, initially successful in the field of hardware design, has recently been applied to software. One of the chief advantages of model checking is the production of counterexamples demonstrating that a system does not satisfy a specification. However, it may require a great deal of human effort to extract the essence of an error from even a detailed source-level trace of a failing run. We use an automated method for finding multiple versions of an error (and similar executions that... (Update)
Cited by: More
Localizing Errors in Counterexample with - Iteratively Witness Searching
(Correct)
Refining Abstractions of Hybrid Systems Using.. - Fehnker, Clarke, Jha..
(Correct)
Partial-Order Reduction and Trail Improvement in.. - Edelkamp.. (2004)
(Correct)
Similar documents (at the sentence level):
71.2%: What Went Wrong: Explaining Counterexamples - Groce, Visser (2003)
(Correct)
Active bibliography (related documents): More All
0.3: Data Abstraction for Cycle Intensive Programs - Sharygina, Browne
(Correct)
0.3: Making the Most of BMC Counterexamples - Groce, Kroening (2004)
(Correct)
0.3: Error Explanation with Distance Metrics - Groce (2004)
(Correct)
Similar documents based on text: More All
0.5: Model Checking Programs - Brat, Havelund, Park, Visser (2000)
(Correct)
0.5: Testing Linear Temporal Logic Formulae on Finite Execution Traces - Havelund, Rosu (2001)
(Correct)
0.5: Monitoring Java Programs with Java PathExplorer - Havelund, Rosu (2001)
(Correct)
Related documents from co-citation: More All
12: Dynamically Discovering Likely Program Invariants to Support Program Evolution
- Ernst, Cockrell et al. - 1999
11: From Symptom to Cause: Localizing Errors in Counterexample Traces
- Ball, Naik et al. - 2003
10: Tracking Down Software Bugs Using Automatic Anomaly Detection
- Hangal, Lam - 2002
BibTeX entry: (Update)
Alex Groce and Willem Visser. What went wrong: Explaining counterexamples. In SPIN Workshop on Model Checking of Software, May 2003. To appear. http://citeseer.ist.psu.edu/article/groce02what.html More
@techreport{ groce-explaining,
author = "Alex Groce and Willem Visser",
title = "Explaining Counterexamples",
year = "2002",
url = "citeseer.ist.psu.edu/article/groce02what.html" }
Citations (may not include all citations):
828
Model Checking
- Clarke, Grumberg et al. - 2000 ACM DBLP
171
Dynamically Discovering Likely Program Invariants to Support..
- Ernst, Cockrell et al. - 1999 ACM DBLP
108
Automatically Validating Temporal Safety Properties of Inter..
- Ball, Rajamani - 2001 ACM DBLP
104
Model Checking Programs
- Visser, Havelund et al. - 2000 ACM DBLP
88
Lazy Abstraction
- Henzinger, Jhala et al. - 2002 ACM DBLP
28
Model Checking Java Programs using Structural Heuristics
- Groce, Visser - 2002 ACM DBLP
20
From Symptom to Cause: Localizing Errors in Counterexample T..
- Ball, Naik et al. - 2003
18
Formal Analysis of the Remote Agent Before and After Flight
- Havelund, Lowry et al. - 2000
16
Simplifying and Isolating Failure-Inducing Input
- Zeller, Hildebrandt - 2002 ACM DBLP
15
Assumption Generation for Software Component Veri cation
- Giannakopoulou, as et al. - 2002
13
Selecting Predicates for Implications in Program Analysis
- Dodoo, Donovan et al. - 2002
11
Fate and Free Will in Error Traces (context) - Jin, Ravi et al. - 2002 ACM DBLP
9
ect Chains from Computer Programs (context) - Zeller - 2002
6
Veri cation of Time Partitioning in the DEOS Scheduler Kerne.. (context) - Penix, Visser et al. - 2000
5
Isolating Failure-Inducing Thread Schedules
- Choi, Zeller - 2002 ACM DBLP
3
A Combined Testing and Veri cation Approach for Software Rel.. (context) - Sharygina, Peled - 2001
The graph only includes citing articles where the year of publication is known.
Documents on the same site (http://www-2.cs.cmu.edu/~agroce/pubs.html): More
What Went Wrong: Explaining Counterexamples - Groce, Visser (2003)
(Correct)
Efficient Model Checking Via Buchi Tableau Automata - Bhat, Cleaveland, Groce (2001)
(Correct)
Model Checking Java Programs using Structural Heuristics - Groce, Visser (2002)
(Correct)
Online articles have much greater impact More about CiteSeer.IST Add search form to your site Submit documents Feedback
CiteSeer.IST - Copyright Penn State and NEC