MetaCartSign in to MyCiteSeer

Include Citations | Advanced Search | Help

Include Citations | Advanced Search | Help

  Preface

Download:
Download as a PDF | Download as a PS
by Morten Heine, B. Srensen
ftp://ftp.diku.dk/diku/semantics/papers/D-368.ps.gz
Add To MetaCart

Abstract:

The Curry-Howard isomorphism states an amazing correspondence between systems of formal logic as encountered in proof theory and computational calculi as found in type theory. For instance, minimal propositional logic corresponds to simply typed-calculus, first-order logic corresponds to dependent types, second-order logic corresponds to polymorphic types, etc. The isomorphism has many aspects, even at the syntactic level: formulas correspond to types, proofs correspond to terms, provability corresponds to inhabitation, proof normalization corresponds to term reduction, etc. But there is much more to the isomorphism than this. For instance, it is an old idea---due to Brouwer, Kolmogorov, and Heyting, and later formalized by Kleene's realizability interpretation---that a constructive proof of an implication is a procedure that transforms proofs of the antecedent into proofs of the succedent; the Curry-Howard isomorphism gives syntactic representations of such procedures. These notes give an introduction to parts of proof theory and related aspects of type theory relevant for the Curry-Howard isomorphism. Outline Since most calculi found in type theory build on-calculus, the notes begin, in Chapter 1, with an introduction to type-free-calculus. The introduction derives the most rudimentary properties of fi-reduction including the Church-Rosser theorem. It also presents Kleene's theorem stating that all recursive functions are-definable and Church's theorem stating that fi-equality is undecidable. As explained above, an important part of the Curry-Howard isomorphism is the idea that a constructive proof of an implication is a certain procedure. This calls for some elaboration of what is meant by constructive proofs, and Chapter 2 therefore presents intuitionistic propositional logic. The chapter presents a natural deduction formulation of minimal and intuitionistic propositional logic. The usual semantics in terms of Heyting algebras and in terms of Kripke models are introduced---the former explained

Citations

366 Deforestation: Transforming programs to eliminate trees – Wadler - 1988
155 Intensional Interpretations of Functionals of Finite Type I – Tait - 1967
100 Metamathematical investigations of intuitionistic arithmetic and analysis – Troelstra - 1973
40 The Correspondence between Cut-Elimination and Normalization – Zucker - 1974
38 A realizability interpretation of the theory of species – Tait - 1975
34 Intuitionistic propositional logic is polynomial-space complete – Statman - 1979
29 Typability and type checking in the second-order -calculus are equivalent and undecidable – Wells - 1994
20 Basic Proof Theory, volume 43 of Cambridge Tracts – Troelstra, Schwichtenberg - 1996
17 Proof search in intuitionistic logic with equality, or back to simultaneous rigid E-unification – Voronkov - 1996
15 Cut rules and explicit substitutions – Vestergaard, Wells - 2001
13 Strong normalization from weak normalization in typed -calculi – Srensen - 1997
4 Definierbare Funktionen im Lambda-Kalkul mit Typen – Schwichtenberg - 1976
4 Normalization in -Calculus and Type Theory – Srensen - 1997
4 Type inhabitation in typed lambda calculi (a syntactic approach – Urzyczyn - 1995
4 A Curry-Howard isomorphism for sequent calculus – Wadler - 1993
2 Non-axiomatizable second-order intuitionistic propositional logic – Skvortsov - 1997
2 On the intuitionistic propositional calculus with quantifiers (russian – Sobolev - 1977
2 Z/lo zono's'c problemu wyprowadzania typ'ow w rachunku lambda – Tyszkiewicz - 1988
2 Positive recursive type assigment – Urzyczyn - 1995