MetaCartSign in to MyCiteSeer

Include Citations | Advanced Search | Help

Include Citations | Advanced Search | Help

  Arguments in favour of admission control for TCP flows (1999) [26 citations — 3 self]

Download:
pdf | ps
by J. Roberts
In: Proceedings ITC 16: Teletraffic engineering in a competitive
http://www.res.enst.fr/~oueslati/Pub/itc16.ps
Add To MetaCart

Abstract:

We advocate the use of admission control to limit the number of TCP flows on a network link to ensure that each has a minimal acceptable throughput. We demonstrate that, in the absence of such a control, the ineffective traffic due to the retransmission of lost packets constitutes a significant overhead and can even lead to congestion collapse in certain configurations. A second cause of inefficiency is the incomplete transmission of documents whose transfer is abandoned by users or higher protocol layers experiencing very low throughput. Admission control removes the cause of flow interruption, maintaining goodput even in case of demand overload. Finally, we discuss implementation issues, recognizing that the proposed admission control procedure is at the limit of current technology. 1

Citations

872 Self-similarity in world wide web traffic: evidence and possible causes – Crovella, Bestavros - 1997
827 Modeling TCP Throughput: a Simple Model and its Empirical Validation – Padhye, Firoiu, et al. - 1998
416 TCP and Explicit Congestion Notification – Floyd - 1994
384 Wide-Area Internet Traffic Patterns and – Thompson, Miller, et al. - 1997
354 Web Server Workload Characterization: The Search for Invariants – Arlitt, Williamson - 1996
343 A Proposal to add Explicit Congestion Notification (ECN) to IP", RFC2491 – Ramakrishnan, Floyd - 1999
335 Applied Probability and Queues – Asmussen - 1987
318 TCP Vegas: End to End Congestion Avoidance on a Global Internet – Brakmo, Peterson - 1995
249 Fundamental design issues for the future Internet – Shenker - 1995
171 Data networks as cascades: Investigating the multifractal nature – Feldmann, Gilbert, et al. - 1998
171 Bandwidth sharing: objectives and algorithms – Massoulie, Roberts - 2002
106 The changing nature of network traffic: Scaling phenomena – Feldmann, Gilbert, et al. - 1998
99 Bandwidth sharing and admission control for elastic traffic,” Telecommunication Systems 15 – Massoulie, Roberts - 2000
86 Flow-Labelled IP: A Connectionless Approach to ATM – Newman, Lyon, et al. - 1996
66 Design Considerations for Supporting TCP with Per-flow Queueing – Suter, Lakshman, et al. - 1998
64 Issues and trends in router design – Keshav, Sharma - 1998
62 Beyond best effort: router architectures for differentiated services of tomorrow’s Internet – Lakshman, Stiliadis - 1998
27 Evolution of Multiprotocol Label Switching – Viswanathan, Feldman, et al. - 1998
20 Realizing quality of service guarantees in multiservice networks – Roberts - 1998
13 Quality of service guarantees and charging in multiservice networks – Roberts - 1998
6 An approach to routing elastic flows – Oueslati-Boulahia, Oubagha - 1999
2 Limits of the best effort traffic management paradigm – Massouli'e, Roberts