Download:
|
by Geoff Hulten, Laurie Spencer, Pedro Domingos
http://www.cs.washington.edu/homes/pedrod/kdd01b.ps.gz
Add To MetaCart
Abstract:
Most statistical and machine-learning algorithms assume that the data is a random sample drawn from a stationary distribution. Unfortunately, most of the large databases available for mining today violate this assumption. They were gathered over months or years, and the underlying processes generating them changed during this time, sometimes radically. Although a number of algorithms have been proposed for learning time-changing concepts, they generally do not scale well to very large databases. In this paper we propose an ecient algorithm for mining decision trees from continuously-changing data streams, based on the ultra-fast VFDT decision tree learner. This algorithm, called CVFDT, stays current while making the most of old data by growing an alternative subtree whenever an old one becomes questionable, and replacing the old with the new when the new becomes more accurate. CVFDT learns a model which is similar in accuracy to the one that would be learned by reapplying VFDT to a moving window of examples every time a new example arrives, but with O(1) complexity per example, as opposed to O(w), where w is the size of the window. Experiments on a set of large time-changing data streams demonstrate the utility of this approach.
Citations
|
3215
|
C4.5: Programs for Machine Learning
– Quinlan
- 1993
|
|
2438
|
Classification and Regression Trees
– Breiman, Friedman, et al.
- 1984
|
|
330
|
Srikant: “Privacy-Preserving Data Mining
– Agrawal, R
- 2000
|
|
161
|
Mining high-speed data streams
– Domingos, Hulten
- 2000
|
|
147
|
Maintenance of discovered association rules in large databases: an 356 incremental updating technique
– Cheung, Han, et al.
- 1996
|
|
122
|
Probability inequalities for sums of bounded random variables
– Hoeding
- 1963
|
|
90
|
Learning in the presence of concept drift and hidden contexts
– Widmer, Kubat
- 1996
|
|
84
|
Megainduction: machine learning on very large databases
– Catlett
- 1991
|
|
79
|
Organization-based analysis of web-object sharing and caching
– Wolman, Voelker, et al.
- 1999
|
|
76
|
BOAToptimistic Decision Tree Construction
– Gehrke, Ganti, et al.
- 1999
|
|
69
|
Activity monitoring: Noticing interesting changes in behavior
– Fawcett, Provost
- 1999
|
|
43
|
Simultaneous Statistical Inference
– Miller
- 1981
|
|
41
|
Mining surprising patterns using temporal description length
– Chakrabarti, Sarawagi, et al.
- 1998
|
|
39
|
Decision theoretic subsampling for induction on large databases
– Musick, Catlett, et al.
- 1993
|
|
37
|
Ramakrishnan R., “DEMON: Mining and Monitoring Evolving Data
– Ganti, Gehrke
- 2000
|
|
35
|
Beyond incremental processing: Tracking concept drift
– Schlimmer, Granger
- 1986
|
|
21
|
Learning changing concepts by exploiting the structure of change
– Bartlett, Ben-David, et al.
- 1996
|
|
21
|
SPRINT: A scalable parallel classi for data mining
– Shafer, Agrawal, et al.
- 1996
|
|
14
|
Sliq: A fast scalable classi for data mining
– Mehta, Agrawal, et al.
- 1996
|
|
11
|
The complexity of learning according to two models of a drifting environment
– Long
- 1998
|
|
10
|
An adaptive algorithm for incremental mining of association rules
– Sarda, Srinivas
- 1998
|
|
8
|
An efficient algorithm to update large itemsets with early pruning
– Ayan, Tansel, et al.
- 1999
|
|
7
|
Cost-sensitive learning bibliography. Online bibliography, Institute for Information Technology
– Turney
- 1997
|
|
4
|
Density-adaptive learning and forgetting
– Salganico
- 1993
|
|
3
|
Special issue on context sensitivity and concept drift
– Kubat
- 1998
|
|
2
|
The impact of changing populations on classi performance
– Keely, Hand, et al.
- 1999
|