MetaCartSign in to MyCiteSeer

Include Citations | Advanced Search | Help

Include Citations | Advanced Search | Help

  Decomposing non-redundant sharing by complementation, Theory and Practice of Logic Programming (1999) [4 citations — 3 self]

Download:
Download as a PDF | Download as a PS
by Enea Zaffanella, Patricia M. Hill, Roberto Bagnaray
Proceedings of the 6th International Symposium
http://www.cs.unipr.it/~bagnara/Papers/PostScript/600dpi/TPLP01R3-600DPI.ps.gz
Add To MetaCart

Abstract:

Complementation, the inverse of the reduced product operation, is a technique for systematically nding minimal decompositions of abstract domains. File and Ranzato advanced the state of the art by introducing a simple method for computing a complement. As an application, they considered the extraction by complementation of the pair-sharing domain PS from the Jacobs and Langen's set-sharing domain SH. However, since the result of this operation was still SH, they concluded that PS was too abstract for this. Here, we show that the source of this result lies not with PS but with SH and, more precisely, with the redundant information contained in SH with respect to ground-dependencies and pair-sharing. In fact, a proper decomposition is obtained if the non-redundant version of SH, PSD, is substituted for SH. To establish the results for PSD, we dene a general schema for subdomains of SH that includes PSD and Def as special cases. This sheds new light on the structure of PSD and exposes a natural though unexpected connection between Def and PSD. Moreover, we substantiate the claim that complementation alone is not sucient to obtain truly minimal decompositions of domains. The right solution to this problem is to rst remove redundancies by computing the quotient of the domain with respect to the observable behavior, and only then decompose it by complementation.

Citations

450 Systematic design of program analysis frameworks – Cousot, Cousot - 1979
303 A Compendium of Continuous Lattices – Gierz, Hofmann, et al. - 1980
88 Static analysis of logic programs for independent AND-parallelism – Jacobs, Langen - 1992
85 A Semantics-Based Framework for the Abstract Interpretation of Prolog – Jones, Sondergaard - 1987
58 Two classes of Boolean functions for dependency analysis. Science of Computer Programming – Armstrong, Marriott, et al. - 1998
42 The birth of prolog – Colmerauer, Roussel - 1992
36 Set-sharing is redundant for pair-sharing – Bagnara, Hill, et al. - 1997
35 Optimal Groundness Analysis Using Propositional Logic – Cortesi, File, et al. - 1996
35 Complementation in abstract interpretation – Cortesi, Fil'e, et al. - 1997
30 Factorizing equivalent variable pairs in ROBDDbased implementations of Pos – Bagnara, Schachte - 1999
22 Complementation of abstract domains made easy – Fil'e, Ranzato - 1996
18 The quotient of an abstract interpretation for comparing static analyses – Cortesi, Filé, et al. - 1998
16 Sharing is optimal – Cortesi, Filé - 1999
16 Completeness in abstract interpretation: A domain perspective – Giacobazzi, Ranzato - 1997
16 The correctness of set-sharing – Hill, Bagnara, et al. - 1998
15 Equations and inequations on and in trees – Colmerauer - 1984
11 Complete abstract interpretations made constructive – Giacobazzi, Ranzato, et al. - 1998
11 Accurate and ecient approximation of variable aliasing in logic programs – Jacobs, Langen - 1989
11 Advanced Techniques for Approximating Variable Aliasing in Logic Programs – Langen - 1990
10 Set-sharing is redundant for pair-sharing, Theoretical Computer Science – Bagnara, Hill, et al. - 2002
7 Building complete abstract interpretations in a linear logic-based setting – Giacobazzi, Ranzato, et al. - 1998
3 Decomposing Non-Redundant Sharing 29 – Codish, Søndergaard - 1998
3 Static Analysis – Levi - 1998
1 2000), the only representation given for the elements of Sh PSh is constituted by in sets of substitutions – In