MetaCartSign in to MyCiteSeer

Include Citations | Advanced Search | Help

Include Citations | Advanced Search | Help

  A conservative data flow algorithm for detecting all pairs of statements that may happen in parallel (1998) [28 citations — 11 self]

Download:
Download as a PDF | Download as a PS
by Gleb Naumovich, George S. Avrunin
In Proceedings of the Sixth ACM SIGSOFT Symposium on the Foundations of Software Engineering
ftp://ftp.cs.umass.edu/pub/techrept/techreport/1998/UM-CS-1998-023.ps
Add To MetaCart

Abstract:

Information about which pairs of statements in a concurrent program can execute in parallel is important for optimizing and debugging programs, for detecting anomalies, and for improving the accuracy of dataflow analysis. In this paper, we describe a new data flow algorithm that finds a conservative approximation of the set of all such pairs. We have carried out an initial comparison of the precision of our algorithm and that of the most precise of the earlier approaches, Masticola and Ryder's non-concurrency analysis [8], using a sample of 147 concurrent Ada programs that includes the collection assembled by Masticola. For these examples, our algorithm was almost always more precise than non-concurrency analysis, in the sense that the set of pairs identified by our algorithm as possibly happening in parallel is a proper subset of the set identified by non-concurrency analysis. In 123 cases, we were able to use reachability analysis to determine exactly the set of pairs of statements that may happen in parallel. For these cases, there were a total of only six pairs identified by our algorithm that cannot actually happen in parallel.

Citations

266 Flow Analysis of Computer Programs – Hecht - 1977
175 Compositional pointer and escape analysis for Java programs – Whaley, Rinard - 1999
158 Precise Concrete Type Inference for Object-Oriented Languages – Plevyak, Chien - 1994
146 A Note on Reliable Full-Duplex Transmission over Half-Duplex Links – Bartlett, Scantlebury, et al. - 1969
124 Data flow analysis for verify-ing properties of concurrent programs – Dwyer, Clarke - 1994
103 Evaluating deadlock detection methods for concurrent software – Corbett - 1996
64 Complexity of analyzing the synchronization structure of concurrent programs – Taylor - 1983
53 Debugging Ada tasking programs – Helmbold, Luckham - 1985
51 Demand interprocedural dataflow anafysis~’ Unpublished Report, Computer Sciences Department, University of Wk.consin, Madkon, WI (). (In preparation – Horwitz, Reps, et al.
51 Static analysis of low-level synchronization – Callahan, Subhlok - 1988
42 Context-sensitive synchronization-sensitive analysis isundecidable – Ramalingam - 2000
41 Non-concurrency analysis – Masticola, Ryder - 1993
33 Analysis of event synchronization in a parallel programming tool – Callahan, Kennedy, et al. - 1990
33 Concurrency analysis in the presence of procedures using a data flow framework – Duesterwald, Soffa - 1991
31 An efficient algorithm for computing MHP information for concurrent java programs – Naumovich, Avrunin, et al. - 1998
30 Task interaction graphs for concurrency analysis – Long, Clarke - 1989
30 Verification of concurrent software with FLAVERS – Naumovich, Clarke, et al. - 1997
26 A Calculus of Communicating Systems, volume 92 – Milner - 1980
23 Static Detection of Deadlocks in Polynomial Time – Masticola - 1995
22 Pointer-induced aliasing: A problem taxonomy – Landi, Ryder - 1991
21 Properties of data flow frameworks – Marlowe, Ryder - 1990
20 Data Flow Analysis for Verifying Correctness Properties of Concurrent Programs – Dwyer - 1995
14 Static infinite wait anomaly detection in polynomial time – Masticola, Ryder - 1990
13 Lattice frameworks for multisource and bidirectional data flow problems – Masticola, Marlowe, et al. - 1995
7 Concurrent algorithms for real-time memory management – Ford - 1988