MetaCartSign in to MyCiteSeer

Include Citations | Advanced Search | Help

Include Citations | Advanced Search | Help

  Belief revision via lamarckian evolution. Submitted for publication, available at http://www. ing. unife. it/docenti/FabrizioRiguzzi/ga2001. ps (2001) [3 citations — 2 self]

Download:
Download as a PDF | Download as a PS
by Evelina Lamma, Fabrizio Riguzzi
University of Bologna (Italy
http://centria.di.fct.unl.pt/~lmp/publications/online-papers/belrev.ps.gz
Add To MetaCart

Abstract:

Abstract. We propose a genetic algorithm to accomplish belief revision. The algorithm implements a new evolutionary strategy resulting from a combination of Darwinian and Lamarckian approaches. Besides encompassing the Darwinian operators of selection, mutation and crossover, it comprises a Lamarckian operator that mutates the genes in a chromosome that code for the believed assumptions. These self mutations are performed as a consequence of the chromosome phenotype's experience obtained while solving a belief revision problem. They are directed by a belief revision procedure which relies on tracing the logical derivations leading to inconsistency of belief, so as to remove the latter's support on the gene coded assumptions, by mutating the genes. The algorithm, with and without the Lamarckian operator, has been tested on a number of belief revision problems, and results show that the addition of the Lamarckian operator improves the efficiency of the algorithm. Additionally, the combination of Darwinian and Lamarckian operators is useful not just for standard belief revision problems, but for problems where different chromosomes may be exposed to different constraints and observations. In these cases, the Lamarckian and Darwinian operators play different roles: the Lamarckian one is employed to bring a given chromosome closer to a solution (or even to find an exact one) to the current belief revision problem, whereas the Darwinian ones exert the role of randomly producing alternative chromosomes in order to deal with unencountered situations, by means of exchanging genes amongst them. We also tested this hypothesis, with positive results, for the case of a multi-agent belief revision setting. 1.

Citations

714 The well-founded semantics for general logic programs – Gelder, Ross, et al. - 1991
177 A new factor in evolution – Baldwin - 1896
122 Well founded semantics for logic programs with explicit negation. in ECAI'92 – Pereira, Alferes - 1992
93 A Cooperative Coevolutionary Approach to Function Optimization – Potter, Jong - 1994
89 The Meme Machine – Blackmore - 1999
87 A logic programming system for nonmonotonic reasoning – Alferes, Damasio, et al. - 1995
72 Lamarkian learning in multi-agent environments – Grefenstette - 1991
70 A coevolutionary approach to learning sequential decision rules – Potter, Jong, et al. - 1995
54 On the logic of theory change – Alchourron, Gardenfors, et al. - 1985
44 Classical” negation in non-monotonic reasoning and logic programming – Alferes, Pereira, et al. - 1998
44 Alferes. Diagnosis and debugging as contradiction removal – Pereira, Dam'asio, et al. - 1993
36 SLX: a top-down derivation procedure for programs with explicit negation – Alferes, Damasio, et al. - 1994
34 Accelerated ATPG and Fault Grading via Testability Analysis – Brglez, Pownall, et al.
32 Optimization with genetic algorithm hybrids that use local search – Hart, Belew - 1996
29 Well-founded abduction via tabled dual programs – Alferes, Pereira, et al. - 1999
24 REVISE: Logic programming and diagnosis – Damasio, Pereira, et al. - 1997
22 A survey on paraconsistent semantics for extended logic programs – Damasio, Pereira - 1998
22 Prolegomena to Logic Programming for Non-Monotonic Reasoning. Nonmonotonic Extensions of Logic Programming – Dix, Pereira, et al. - 1997
22 Belief Base Dynamics – Hansson - 1991
19 The Sel Gene – Dawkins - 1976
18 Reasoning with Logic Programming, volume 1111. Springer-Verlag LNAI – Alferes, Pereira - 1996
15 Cultural transmission of information in genetic programming – Spector, Luke - 1996
14 Culture enhances the evolvability of cognition – Spector, Luke - 1996
14 Revising beliefs received from multiple source – Dragoni, Giorgini - 1999
9 Model reduction in control systems by means of global structure evolution and local parameter learning – Li, Tan, et al. - 1996
7 A case for lamarckian evolution – Ackely, Littman - 1994
7 Multi-agent logic aided lamarckian learning – Lamma, Pereira, et al. - 2000
6 A survey of parallel genetic algorithms – Cant-Paz - 1998
2 on Logic Programming – Symp - 1994
2 Approximate satistical tests for comparing supervised classi learning algorithms. Neural Computation, in press (draft version available at http://www.cs.orst.edu/ tgd/projects /supervised.html – Dietterich - 2000
1 Conference on Genetic Algorithms – Intl - 1991
1 Belief revision in multiagent systems – Verlag - 1996
1 de Rosis, Rino Falcone, Emanuele Covino, and Cristano Castelfranchi. Bayesian cognitive diagnosis in believable multiagent systems – Fiorella - 1999
1 Przymusinski: 1998, "`Classical" Negation in Non-monotonic Reasoning and Logic Programming – Alferes, Pereira, et al.
1 Well-founded Abduction via – Alferes, Pereira, et al. - 1999