Abstract. In this paper we introduce the deliberating robber, an example of reasoning about preferences in a logic of desires. We show that two defeasible reasoning schemes proposed in qualitative decision theory derive counterintuitive consequences. 1
|
609
|
Decision with multiple objectives: Preferences and value tradeoffs,” Cambridge
– Keeney, Raiffa
- 1976
|
|
498
|
Modal Logic: An Introduction
– Chellas
- 1980
|
|
291
|
Planning and Control
– Dean, Wellman
- 1991
|
|
165
|
Reasoning about change
– Shoham
- 1988
|
|
154
|
Towards a logic for qualitative decision theory
– Boutilier
- 1994
|
|
140
|
System Z: a Natural Ordering of Defaults with Tractable Applications to Default Reasoning
– Pearl
- 1990
|
|
120
|
The Logic of Decision
– Jeffrey
- 1965
|
|
96
|
Preferential semantics for goals
– Wellman, Doyle
- 1991
|
|
84
|
Conditional entailment: Bridging two approaches to default reasoning
– Geffner, Pearl
- 1992
|
|
77
|
A maximum entropy approach to nonmonotonic reasoning
– Goldszmidt, Morris, et al.
- 1993
|
|
71
|
From conditional oughts to qualitative decision theory
– Pearl
- 1993
|
|
60
|
An analysis of some deontic logics
– Hansson
- 1971
|
|
53
|
Contrary-to-duty imperatives and deontic logic
– Chisholm
- 1963
|
|
52
|
Qualitative decision theory
– Tan, Pearl
- 1994
|
|
48
|
Applications of Deontic Logic in Computer Science: A concise view
– Meyer
- 1993
|
|
38
|
Conditional desires and utilities - an alternative approach to qualitative decision theory
– Lang
- 1996
|
|
35
|
Conditional Logics for Default Reasoning and Belief Revision
– Boutilier
- 1992
|
|
34
|
Gentle murder, or the adverbial Samaritan
– Forrester
- 1984
|
|
34
|
Dynamic goal hierarchies
– Bell, Huang
- 1997
|
|
32
|
Contrary-to-duty obligations
– Prakken, Sergot
- 1996
|
|
31
|
The logic of relative desires
– Doyle, Shoham, et al.
- 1991
|
|
30
|
Specification and evaluation of preferences under uncertainty
– Tan, Pearl
- 1994
|
|
25
|
Semantic analysis for dyadic deontic logic
– Lewis
- 1974
|
|
25
|
Nondeterministic Action and Dominance: Foundations for Planning and Qualitative Decision
– Thomason, Horty
- 1996
|
|
23
|
Reasoning about Obligations: Defeasibility in Preference-Based Deontic Logic
– Torre
- 1997
|
|
21
|
Preference-based deontic logic (PDL
– Hansson
- 1990
|
|
16
|
Exploiting the normative aspect of preference: a deontic logic without actions
– Brown, Mantha, et al.
- 1993
|
|
12
|
A logic of good, would and should, part 2
– Goble
- 1990
|
|
10
|
Does the logic of preference rest on a mistake? Metaphilosophy
– Mullen
- 1979
|
|
9
|
A utilitarian semantics for deontic logic
– Jennings
- 1974
|
|
8
|
On the semantics and logic of obligation
– Jackson
- 1985
|
|
7
|
Good Samaritans, contrary-to-duty imperatives, and epistemic obligations
– Aqvist
- 1967
|
|
6
|
Modalities over actions: 1. model theory
– McCarty
- 1994
|
|
6
|
Labeled logics of goals
– Torre
- 1998
|
|
6
|
Goals, desires, utilities and preferences
– Torre, Weydert
- 1998
|
|
2
|
Aspectual actions and the deepest paradox of deontic logic
– Castaneda
- 1986
|
|
